On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 14:40 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com> writes:
> >> After all, it seems to me that the one in
> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/253346
> >> struck the right balance among various abuses; let's use the error
> >> reporter from that version, instead of going down this rabbit hole.
> >> Thanks.
> > So is that patch series version acceptable then? Or should I spin one
> > again that is in that vein?
> I do not offhand know what other changes you had in v9 since
> $gmane/253346, so I'll leave it up to you. If the only difference
> is the error reporting codepath, and you are happy with what I have
> in my tree
> $ git log -p --reverse -3 a93d886b9
> then we can proceed with that version. Have there been any issues
> raised on that older version other than error reporting?
I'll double check.