Karthik Nayak <[email protected]> writes:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Minor nits on the design. %(align:<width>[,<position>]) would let
>> us write %(align:16)...%(end) and use the "default position", which
>> may be beneficial if one kind of alignment is prevalent (I guess all
>> the internal users left-align?) %(align:<position>,<width>) forces
>> users to spell both out all the time.
>>
>
> Isn't that better? I mean It sets a format which the others eventually
> can follow
> %(atom:suboption,value).
> For example: %(objectname:abbrev,size)
No, I do not think it is better. First of all, the similarity you
are perceiving does not exist. For 'objectname:abbrev', the 'size'
is a property of the 'abbrev'. For 'align:left', the 'width' is not
a property of the position. It is a property given to 'align'
(i.e. you have this many display columns to work with).
Also, if there are ways other than 'abbrev' that '8' could affect
the way how %(objectname) is modified, then it should be spelled as
%(objectname:abbrev=8). To specify two modification magics, each of
which takes a number, the user would say e.g.
%(objectname:abbrev=8,magic=4)
The syntax %(objectname:abbrev,size) would not allow you to extend
it nicely---you would end up with %(objectname:abbrev,8,magic,4) or
something silly like that.
Seeing your %(objectname:abbrev,size), I'd imagine that you are
assuming that you will never allow any magic other than 'abbrev'
that takes a number to %(objectname). And under that assumption
%(objectname:8) would be a short-hand for %(objectname:8,abbrev).
And that would be following %(align:8). Both 'left' (implied
default) and '8' are instructing 'align' what to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
