Jeff King <p...@peff.net> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 08:48:26AM +0100, John Keeping wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 06:44:31PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>> > [1] I do think the error message for "relative-local is nonsense" could
>> > perhaps be more explanatory, but I couldn't come up with any better
>> > wording. But if you have ideas, feel free to switch it.
>>
>> My only suggestion would be to reuse the "unknown date format: %s"
>> message and avoid having a special message in this case.
>
> Heh, that was what I was trying to avoid. I wanted to avoid "I do not
> understand our request" and have it more like "I understand what you're
> _trying_ to do, but it doesn't make sense".
>
> I guess "relative dates do not depend on timezones, so -local is
> meaningless" would be the closest thing.
>
> I don't think it is that big a deal whichever way we go, though.
I somehow thought that the discussion was about raw-local, not
relative-local, but anyway, I think it would make more sense to
allow both of them. If you define the meaning of "-local" as:
Pretend that the event in question was recorded with your
timezone, and show the timestamp using the specified format sans
-local suffix.
that explains what happens for all the other formats well, and it
also makes sense for what would happen to raw and even relative, I
think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
