John Keeping <j...@keeping.me.uk> writes: > In which case, should we just support it now? > > Normally I'd suggest banning controversial options on the basis that > it's easier in the future to allow something that was previously banned > than change the meaning of an options, but in this case I can't see any > other meaning for these options than that described above.
My usual stance is the same as yours, and I agree that there is no other sane and useful behaviour for "relative-local" to do the same as "relative". As we'll go into pre-release feature freeze soonish, we have enough time to add missing support to the code (the new feature won't have to make the upcoming 2.6 wait). Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
