Matthieu Moy <matthieu....@grenoble-inp.fr> writes:
> OTOH, you are now accepting %(atom:) as a synonym to %(atom), and it's
> not clear whether this is a deliberate decition.
I would say so. When the caller wants to reject %(atom:), the
caller can tell it by checking val[0] == '\0' and reject that.
So it is better if you did not do this:
> if (!body[1]) {
> /* "atom_name:" */
> *val = NULL;
> return 1;
> }
which robs that information from the caller. It should be
sufficient to just drop the check that allows "colorx" when
expecting "color" without making any other change, I would think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
