Karthik Nayak <karthik....@gmail.com> writes: > It is one thing that the user can actually do the check themselves, > but doesn't it make more sense that when we're using colon we expect a > value after it, and something like %(color:) makes no sense when color > specifically needs a value after the colon.
If you imagine the format being built by scripts (we are talking about plumbing feature --format here), I think you will realize that it perfectly makes sense to allow them to say "%(atom:$modifiation)" without having to worry about a special case where $modification happened to end up being empty. So no, I do not agree with your statement at all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
