Michael J Gruber <g...@drmicha.warpmail.net> writes: >> Does this mean that I should warn in the release notes that some >> existing users might get their expectation broken but we are going >> ahead anyway because we think most people read left to right and >> then top down? I am OK with saying that--I just wanted to make sure >> we know that it is what we are doing. > > I would claim that anyone who notices the difference in buffer numbering > would be positively surprised.
Thanks. I, being a non-user of vim, was wondering if people who had their own user-defined commands (macros? and possibly short-cut keys to invoke them) built around the old (and odd) numbering need to adjust--in which case we may need to forewarn. > In any case, the buffer numbering is not the same (it is local remote > base merge) but it doesn't matter in this case because only one window > is displayed, so there is no visual association. OK, thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
