On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Junio C Hamano <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <[email protected]>
>> ---
>>  git-submodule.sh | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh
>> index 5a4dec0..7698102 100755
>> --- a/git-submodule.sh
>> +++ b/git-submodule.sh
>> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ cmd_update()
>>                       if test -z "$nofetch"
>>                       then
>>                               # Fetch remote before determining tracking 
>> $sha1
>> -                             (sanitize_submodule_env; cd "$sm_path" && 
>> git-fetch) ||
>> +                             fetch_in_submodule "$sm_path" ||
>>                               die "$(eval_gettext "Unable to fetch in 
>> submodule path '\$sm_path'")"
>>                       fi
>>                       remote_name=$(sanitize_submodule_env; cd "$sm_path" && 
>> get_default_remote)
>
> Makes sense.  The main topic does not depend on this change, I hope,
> as I think it is OK to queue this separately and have it graduate
> before 2.9-rc1.


It doesn't, I should have send this as an independent series/patch.

Thanks,
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to