gemmellr commented on a change in pull request #3079: ARTEMIS-2706 Use 
FrameSize to decide when to flush large messages
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/3079#discussion_r408038172
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
artemis-protocols/artemis-amqp-protocol/src/main/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/protocol/amqp/proton/ProtonServerSenderContext.java
 ##########
 @@ -862,7 +862,9 @@ void deliver() {
 
                   sender.send(buf.array(), 0, size);
 
-                  connection.instantFlush();
+                  if (protonSession.session.getOutgoingBytes() >= 
protonSession.session.getConnection().getTransport().getOutboundFrameSizeLimit())
 {
+                     connection.instantFlush();
+                  }
 
 Review comment:
   I dont think this makes the most sense as there isnt anything to say there 
arent bytes for other messages in the session, so using that to govern 
behaviour for a particular delivery isnt a reliable way to achieve the desired 
behaviour.
   
   The delivery has its own buffer, using that to govern behaviour would seem 
the most appropriate, see Delivery.pending() and available() (which both do the 
same thing hehe, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-1409).
   
   Just checking the brokers outbound size limit doesnt allow for the fact the 
receivers frame size may be lower than it, so it may be worth calculating the 
lower of the two, otherwise it may never flush here. Similarly, the return 
slightly higher up may mean it returns without flushing.
   
   The flush here will presumably also be why ARTEMIS-2707 occurred, since the 
delivery isnt indicated complete (sender.advance()) or settled (which 
implicitly completes) until further down just before another flush, yet would 
have already had all its payload sent at this point. With the addition of an 
'if outstanding is over frame size' guard here it would become less certain 
whether the flush and subsquent empty transfer occurred however, depending then 
on whether the threshhold was exceeded after the last send.
   
   I'd note that by creating such a small buffer, you are forcing a similarly 
small allocation on every send call as the payload is copied into the delivery. 
Using a bigger buffer would seem sensible when appropriate. Perhaps the message 
size can be discerned and something suitable selected based on that and the 
frame sizing. Or also using NettyReadable and sendNoCopy to avoid the copy.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to