gemmellr commented on code in PR #4395: URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4395#discussion_r1130775302
########## tests/soak-tests/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/artemis/tests/soak/interruptlm/LargeMessageInterruptTest.java: ########## @@ -0,0 +1,244 @@ +/* + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more + * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership. + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0 + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with + * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at + * + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 + * + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and + * limitations under the License. + */ + +package org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.soak.interruptlm; + +import javax.jms.Connection; +import javax.jms.ConnectionFactory; +import javax.jms.MessageConsumer; +import javax.jms.MessageProducer; +import javax.jms.Session; +import javax.jms.TextMessage; +import java.io.File; +import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles; +import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch; +import java.util.concurrent.CyclicBarrier; +import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService; +import java.util.concurrent.Executors; +import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit; +import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger; + +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.config.ActiveMQDefaultConfiguration; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.RoutingType; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.management.ObjectNameBuilder; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.api.core.management.QueueControl; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.soak.SoakTestBase; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.util.CFUtil; +import org.apache.activemq.artemis.tests.util.Wait; +import org.junit.Assert; +import org.junit.Before; +import org.junit.Test; +import org.slf4j.Logger; +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory; + +// This is used to kill a server and make sure the server will remove any pending files. +public class LargeMessageInterruptTest extends SoakTestBase { + + public static final String SERVER_NAME_0 = "interruptlm"; + private static final String JMX_SERVER_HOSTNAME = "localhost"; + private static final int JMX_SERVER_PORT_0 = 1099; + private static final Logger logger = LoggerFactory.getLogger(MethodHandles.lookup().lookupClass()); + static String liveURI = "service:jmx:rmi:///jndi/rmi://" + JMX_SERVER_HOSTNAME + ":" + JMX_SERVER_PORT_0 + "/jmxrmi"; + static ObjectNameBuilder liveNameBuilder = ObjectNameBuilder.create(ActiveMQDefaultConfiguration.getDefaultJmxDomain(), "lminterrupt", true); + Process serverProcess; + + public ConnectionFactory createConnectionFactory(String protocol) { + return CFUtil.createConnectionFactory(protocol, "tcp://localhost:61616"); + } + + @Before + public void before() throws Exception { + cleanupData(SERVER_NAME_0); + serverProcess = startServer(SERVER_NAME_0, 0, 30000); + disableCheckThread(); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageAMQPTX() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("AMQP", true, false); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageAMQPTXPaging() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("AMQP", true, true); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageCORETX() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("CORE", true, false); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageCORETXPaging() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("CORE", true, true); + } + + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageOPENWIRETX() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("OPENWIRE", true, false); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageOPENWIRETXPaging() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("OPENWIRE", true, true); + } + + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageAMQPNonTX() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("AMQP", false, false); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageAMQPNonTXPaging() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("AMQP", false, true); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageCORENonTX() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("CORE", false, false); + } + + @Test + public void testInterruptLargeMessageCORENonTXPaging() throws Throwable { + testInterruptLM("CORE", false, true); + } + + private void testInterruptLM(String protocol, boolean tx, boolean paging) throws Throwable { + final int BODY_SIZE = 500 * 1024; + final int NUMBER_OF_MESSAGES = 10; // this is per producer + final int SENDING_THREADS = 10; + CyclicBarrier startFlag = new CyclicBarrier(SENDING_THREADS); + final CountDownLatch done = new CountDownLatch(SENDING_THREADS); + final AtomicInteger produced = new AtomicInteger(0); + final ConnectionFactory factory = createConnectionFactory(protocol); + final AtomicInteger errors = new AtomicInteger(0); // I don't expect many errors since this test is disconnecting and reconnecting the server + final CountDownLatch killAt = new CountDownLatch(40); + + ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newFixedThreadPool(SENDING_THREADS); + runAfter(executorService::shutdownNow); + + String queueName = "LargeMessageInterruptTest"; + + String largebody; + + { + StringBuffer buffer = new StringBuffer(); + while (buffer.length() < BODY_SIZE) { + buffer.append("LOREM IPSUM WHATEVER THEY SAY IN THERE I DON'T REALLY CARE. I'M NOT SURE IF IT'S LOREM, LAUREM, LAUREN, IPSUM OR YPSUM AND I DON'T REALLY CARE "); + } + largebody = buffer.toString(); + } + + if (paging) { + try (Connection connection = factory.createConnection()) { + Session session = connection.createSession(true, Session.SESSION_TRANSACTED); + MessageProducer producer = session.createProducer(session.createQueue(queueName)); + for (int i = 0; i < 1000; i++) { + producer.send(session.createTextMessage("forcePage")); + } + session.commit(); + } + } + + for (int i = 0; i < SENDING_THREADS; i++) { + executorService.execute(() -> { + int numberOfMessages = 0; + try { + Connection connection = factory.createConnection(); + Session session = connection.createSession(tx, tx ? Session.SESSION_TRANSACTED : Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE); + MessageProducer producer = session.createProducer(session.createQueue(queueName)); + + startFlag.await(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS); + while (numberOfMessages < NUMBER_OF_MESSAGES) { + try { + producer.send(session.createTextMessage(largebody)); + if (tx) { + session.commit(); + } + produced.incrementAndGet(); + killAt.countDown(); + if (numberOfMessages++ % 10 == 0) { + logger.info("Sent {}", numberOfMessages); + } + } catch (Exception e) { + logger.warn(e.getMessage(), e); + + logger.warn(e.getMessage(), e); + try { + connection.close(); + } catch (Throwable ignored) { + } + + for (int retryNumber = 0; retryNumber < 100; retryNumber++) { + try { + Connection ctest = factory.createConnection(); + ctest.close(); + break; + } catch (Throwable retry) { + Thread.sleep(100); + } + } + + connection = factory.createConnection(); + session = connection.createSession(tx, tx ? Session.SESSION_TRANSACTED : Session.AUTO_ACKNOWLEDGE); + producer = session.createProducer(session.createQueue(queueName)); + connection.start(); + + } + } + } catch (Exception e) { + logger.warn("Error getting the initial connection", e); + errors.incrementAndGet(); + } + + logger.info("Done sending"); + done.countDown(); + }); + } + + Assert.assertTrue(killAt.await(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS)); + serverProcess.destroyForcibly(); + serverProcess = startServer(SERVER_NAME_0, 0, 0); + QueueControl queueControl = getQueueControl(liveURI, liveNameBuilder, queueName, queueName, RoutingType.ANYCAST, 5000); + + Assert.assertTrue(done.await(60, TimeUnit.SECONDS)); + Assert.assertEquals(0, errors.get()); + + long numberOfMessages = queueControl.getMessageCount(); Review Comment: Sure, I didnt say it was unused, only that it goes to the effort of spinning and potentially spewing stacktraces by connecting before the broker is ready...only to wait for the sending to complete before then using it. Why not create it after the wait for send completion when we know the broker is ready? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
