jcamachor commented on a change in pull request #787: HIVE-22239
URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/787#discussion_r332979645
##########
File path: ql/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/hive/ql/stats/StatsUtils.java
##########
@@ -856,8 +856,15 @@ public static ColStatistics
getColStatistics(ColumnStatisticsObj cso, String tab
} else if (colTypeLowerCase.equals(serdeConstants.BINARY_TYPE_NAME)) {
cs.setAvgColLen(csd.getBinaryStats().getAvgColLen());
cs.setNumNulls(csd.getBinaryStats().getNumNulls());
- } else if (colTypeLowerCase.equals(serdeConstants.TIMESTAMP_TYPE_NAME) ||
- colTypeLowerCase.equals(serdeConstants.TIMESTAMPLOCALTZ_TYPE_NAME)) {
+ } else if (colTypeLowerCase.equals(serdeConstants.TIMESTAMP_TYPE_NAME)) {
+ cs.setAvgColLen(JavaDataModel.get().lengthOfTimestamp());
+ cs.setNumNulls(csd.getTimestampStats().getNumNulls());
+ Long lowVal = (csd.getTimestampStats().getLowValue() != null) ?
csd.getTimestampStats().getLowValue()
+ .getSecondsSinceEpoch() : null;
+ Long highVal = (csd.getTimestampStats().getHighValue() != null) ?
csd.getTimestampStats().getHighValue()
+ .getSecondsSinceEpoch() : null;
+ cs.setRange(lowVal, highVal);
Review comment:
Yeah, I did not want to change the information that we store for timestamp
type, note that this patch only changes the way we read the data. I agree we
could use finer granularity for different types.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
