kgyrtkirk commented on PR #5037: URL: https://github.com/apache/hive/pull/5037#issuecomment-1923666355
just seen the details you linked to the PR. I believe the `link` should be allowed - but in this the merge should be allowed due to the fact that these things represent the same thing. I see now why the signature become an obstacle - I believe the SWO was able to match the same plan-parts to only scan the table once; if you don't have `link` calls there to explain the situation -> that could cause `equiv violations` here...could you please check that? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
