@codebrainz of course you can, but when @b4n agreed that extra changes unrelated to this PR are needed, I just noted they should be a separate issue/PR, not something that stalls this PR.
@kugel- this PR does not go on top of #1470 does it? The problem was just identified there and this can be applied separately? And basically its got nothing to test, except warnings with `--b4n-pedantic` compile options? -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/1561#issuecomment-318229671
