> Maybe I should add a few extra lines to that test with some of the new corner > cases I'm now capturing, like the case with = in a comment.
Certainly more is always better, in case someone else breaks it at some point :-) > As per the level of support for regular expressions, I see no other ctags > parser using tagRegexTable, so I'm not sure it's supported. (But even if it > is, I'm not sure it's a good idea to use it only for Matlab.) Yeah, as per the comment in #3170 there are no others, and there is a common apprehension that regex parsers are slow, so having them run between keystrokes is an issue. > I notice that other tests have a much more complex .tags file which seems to > include an argument list, You are running up against the limits of my knowledge of ctags/tagmangler (the expert referred to previously is _NOT_ me) but IIUC the arglist is a separate field on the tag, its not part of the tag name (for the reasons you made this PR). Not sure how that is added, maybe look at a parser that does it? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3358#issuecomment-1364809047 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3358/[email protected]>
