> ... performance issues... I will ask someone who is having some performance issues while using some GeanyLua scripts whether he's willing to try LuaJIT to see if there's any noticeable difference. But I think the problem is that the computer is just slow.
> True, and https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1235 suggests the > changes are simple enough that both 5.1 and 5.4 C APIs could be supported > within the #ifdef pain threshold. As a wise man once said, if offered a > questionable choice, take all three (at least until a winner is clear). I'd request that adding support for 5.4, be deferred until late in 1.39 development or even a future release. This would make backporting bug fixes prior to the transition easier (eg, if a 1.38.1 bugfix branch were created). For instance, fixes for geany.activate (#1234) and geany.keygrab (#1236) can be applied to 1.38 with unmodified git-generated patches. #1235 itself would require more work to backport and would complicate backporting any subsequently written bugfix. (Is there a git command to extract only commits/patches that apply to one plugin/folder?) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/issues/1133#issuecomment-1455390647 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany-plugins/issues/1133/[email protected]>
