> #3358 which I understand was ready to merge but has been sitting there for a > while.
Geany does __NOT__ want to maintain parsers separate from ctags, we simply do not have the effort available to devote to language specifics, and making changes available upstream means more people benefit from them and more language expert eyes get to check and improve them. So my understanding was that either that a version of the Geany C parser was to be upgraded to include any extra capability that the ctags regex parser had and was then merged upstream, or the regex based parser from upstream was merged into Geany. Not that changes were made solely on the Geany parser. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3563#issuecomment-1745977865 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3563/[email protected]>
