> So my understanding was that either that a version of the Geany C parser was > to be upgraded to include any extra capability that the ctags regex parser > had and was then merged upstream, or the regex based parser from upstream was > merged into Geany. Not that changes were made solely on the Geany parser.
But until that happens, shouldn't the existing parser at least be patched to work properly? I agree that the ideal solution will eventually involve throwing all this code in the garbage and replacing it with the new fancy tags anyway, but until then, let's at least have a Matlab parser that isn't broken, even if it is only going to be temporary until it gets replaced. (As for making the changes available upstream, I understand that the upstream ctags parser for Matlab is already way more complete than this, so it wouldn't benefit from these changes anyway; as I said, this is just meant as a workaround to fix something that is currently broken in Geany.) -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3563#issuecomment-1746014380 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3563/[email protected]>
