> I'm not sure how robust our parser is against invalid input I wrote most of it, it ought to be perfect :grin:
> or updated ctags file format In theory the format is perfectly well defined and stable (just adding new extension fields), so it should be fine™. But in practice uctags added support for escape sequences, which our parser doesn't understand, so it isn't. > so better use the upstream version of the official library to parse ctags > files so we don't have to worry about this. Yeah, it's a very large diff, but I guess using the canonical implementation is worth the extra copy. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3049#issuecomment-1756418866 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3049/c1756418...@github.com>
