@b4n commented on this pull request.

LGTM from little review and testing apart from:
* the comment about the patch file
* the absence of tags parsing.  the custom filetype version uses Java, which 
seems to do a decent job (beware that not knowing the language, I just copied a 
couple of samples and lanced at the results), should this one do the same?

> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ index cd4b23617..af4a73db4 100644
 +              &lmCPP,
 +              &lmCss,
 +              &lmD,
++              &lmDart,

As this isn't updating the chunk header, it's gonna corrupt the patch, isn't it?

> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ index cd4b23617..af4a73db4 100644
 +              &lmCPP,
 +              &lmCss,
 +              &lmD,
++              &lmDart,

…well OK, it's already broken since at least 
a9363bc15d2c66ea91eeec923961f93e41bff216, but is that an excuse? :)

-- 
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3973#pullrequestreview-2350602121
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.

Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3973/review/[email protected]>

Reply via email to