> the absence of tags parsing. the custom filetype version uses Java, which > seems to do a decent job (beware that not knowing the language, I just copied > a couple of samples and lanced at the results), should this one do the same?
This is what I wanted to test but then forgot about it. I'll add it. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany/pull/3973#issuecomment-2407955643 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany/pull/3973/[email protected]>
