fireclawthefox left a comment (geany/geany-plugins#1576) Both your comments sound reasonable and as I won't be able to tell you how both of them could be tested, I'd say it's good enough for now so I would approve it in this state but maybe add some cleanup tasks so those topics may get clarified sometime in the future. But that's just what I would recommend, not sure if there are already rulings for geany plugin development that define a certain path to follow here.
-- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/geany/geany-plugins/pull/1576#issuecomment-4759869625 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: <geany/geany-plugins/pull/1576/[email protected]>
