emkornfield commented on pull request #7604: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7604#issuecomment-653223390
> And for tz-naive we don't need to handle any timezone issue, and can just convert it do a datetime.datetime object, which by default is also tz-naive and can thus be used as is. I think this is the potentially confusing part. it is quite possible it is just me. But if the timestamp is meant for display purposes, I would expect the tz-naive datetime value to reflect the local timezone. Since it displays a "calendar" like object. This isn't clear cut case just stating my expectations. I think this might be a conversation to be had on the ML. To finish up the conversation, the reason for not always using to the to_object path, is because I don't want to potentially change functionality of pandas conversion to datetime. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org