liukun4515 commented on issue #3325: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/3325#issuecomment-1234943964
> I fully understand and support that we are trying to mirror PG syntax. But I don't think that should prevent us from supporting a superset of data types that PG doesn't. Especially when the support already exists in Arrow and DataFusion functions and we just need this thin shim to extend the support to SQL. Arrow and datafusion are two different project, we don't need to align function or feature for them. I think datafusion is a sql/core lib, and datafusion can use other memory computing lib without the arrow-rs/arrow. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
