avantgardnerio commented on issue #3310: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/3310#issuecomment-1305829023
@milenkovicm I think that's not a bad idea, and some versions of the PR did exactly that... however I do think there's one choice to be made: 1. do we add an optional parameter to the existing `async` method? 2. or do we make a new synchronous method (perhaps `with_schema`) to do the same? I would be fine either way, but I think the purpose of the `async` part was to allow providers to access the network to infer the schema, so it might not be needed if the schema is provided. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
