jorisvandenbossche commented on PR #375:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/375#issuecomment-1401696346

   I am wondering: do we need / want this? 
   I know we build conda packages in the main Arrow CI, but my experience is 
that this is 1) quite uncommon (I don't know any other package I contribute to 
that does this, but to be fair those packages also don't have such a 
complicated build setup, but adbc is also much less complicated compared to 
arrow), and 2) gives quite some maintenance overhead to keep this up to date 
and synced with upstream conda-forge. 
   
   If the reason to do this is to ensure that our conda packages will work 
before doing the final release (avoid needing to patch/make a bug fix release 
if the upstream conda packages turn out to be failing with a new release), we 
can also trigger a build in the upstream conda-forge feedstock once a first RC 
is out, and that way ensure conda builds are passing before the final release. 
   
   (note, I am currently not actively contributing to this repo and helping its 
maintenance, so I don't have much of a say in this, but at least I wanted to 
mention the option that we can also _not_ do this ;))


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to