rtpsw commented on code in PR #34311:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/34311#discussion_r1116943897
##########
cpp/src/arrow/compute/kernels/hash_aggregate_test.cc:
##########
@@ -301,53 +426,184 @@ Result<Datum> GroupByTest(const std::vector<Datum>&
arguments,
{t_agg.function, t_agg.options, "agg_" + ToChars(idx),
t_agg.function});
idx = idx + 1;
}
- return RunGroupBy(arguments, keys, internal_aggregates, use_threads);
+ return group_by(arguments, keys, segment_keys, internal_aggregates,
use_threads,
+ /*naive=*/false);
}
-} // namespace
+Result<Datum> GroupByTest(GroupByFunction group_by, const std::vector<Datum>&
arguments,
+ const std::vector<Datum>& keys,
+ const std::vector<TestAggregate>& aggregates,
+ bool use_threads) {
+ return GroupByTest(group_by, arguments, keys, {}, aggregates, use_threads);
+}
-TEST(Grouper, SupportedKeys) {
- ASSERT_OK(Grouper::Make({boolean()}));
+template <typename GroupClass>
Review Comment:
Yes. There is also a logical relationship - a segmenter defines its segments
using a grouper - so this compatibility is expected.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
