westonpace commented on issue #34484: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/34484#issuecomment-1458922632
Your plan is good. It seems we are doing way too much testing with in-memory tables :cold_sweat: Since you are actually scanning it is using a scan node. The scan node is obnoxiously (and incorrectly) appending the augmented fields `(__fragment_index, __batch_index, __last_in_fragment, __filename)`. This is a bug in the Acero's Substrait handling for scan. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
