mingmwang commented on PR #6675: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/6675#issuecomment-1594661527
@jiangzhx In the original UTs, there are some comments to explain why the plan is like this, For example: `exists_subquery_with_limit`, `in_correlated_subquery_with_limit` In some cases the limit is removed and the subquery is de-correlated, in some cases it is not. Could you please add the comments back to the slt file ? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
