jiangzhx commented on PR #6675: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/6675#issuecomment-1594796514
> @jiangzhx In the original UTs, there are some comments to explain why the plan is like this, For example: > > `exists_subquery_with_limit`, `in_correlated_subquery_with_limit` > > In some cases the limit is removed and the subquery is de-correlated, in some cases it is not. > > Could you please add the comments back to the slt file ? @mingmwang Following your suggestion, I have already made the changes. I hope you have time to help me review it again. thanks for your help. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
