gstvg commented on PR #9743: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/9743#issuecomment-2019184306
> Thanks for your explain, @gstvg ! Yeah, in my previous thought, `struct` udf will not be called after this PR, so if we just remove `struct` udf, would it also work? ( I think so but not sure) Yes, you're right, `named_struct` doesn't require the `struct` udf, but some expr-based code somewhere may depend on it, it is enough to justify it's existance? I'm don't know much about the retrocompatibility guidelines of datafusion. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
