felipecrv commented on PR #41115: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41115#issuecomment-2048267191
> > The definition is the same, but the naming is unclear and ambiguous: > > Regardless of the name, we shouldn't have two functions doing the same thing. They could evolve in different ways in the future with the addition of new types. It's a coincidence that the intention of both matches today's implementations. > So at least this should be renaming the existing function (but I find your proposition rather wordy). I also think it's a long name, but I couldn't come up with a shorter one, do you have a name suggestion? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
