zanmato1984 commented on PR #41335: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41335#issuecomment-2095189060
I'll wait a couple of more days for @pitrou 's opinion on the per-node stack approach. If that sounds good to you, I'll subject this PR to it. Thanks. Quoting my previous summary about the per-node stack approach: > I'm in favor of the per-node stack approach as the presumption about the overflow-ness of shared stack doesn't stand no more. Plus the following additional reasons: 1) it doesn't introduce more performance penalty than shared stack; 2) it can mitigate the overflow in a natural way, i.e., expanding the stack size linear to the number of nodes; 3) it requires no more complexity to the existing stack implementation. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
