cocoa-xu commented on code in PR #499:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-nanoarrow/pull/499#discussion_r1621243633


##########
src/nanoarrow/array_test.cc:
##########
@@ -787,6 +787,43 @@ TEST(ArrayTest, ArrayTestAppendToFloatArray) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(arrow_array.ValueUnsafe()->Equals(expected_array.ValueUnsafe(), 
options));
 }
 
+TEST(ArrayTest, ArrayTestAppendToHalfFloatArray) {
+  struct ArrowArray array;
+
+  ASSERT_EQ(ArrowArrayInitFromType(&array, NANOARROW_TYPE_HALF_FLOAT), 
NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayStartAppending(&array), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendInt(&array, 1), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendNull(&array, 2), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendUInt(&array, 3), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendDouble(&array, 3.14), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendDouble(&array, std::numeric_limits<float>::max()),
+            NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendDouble(&array, NAN), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendDouble(&array, INFINITY), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendDouble(&array, -INFINITY), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendDouble(&array, -1), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayAppendDouble(&array, 0), NANOARROW_OK);
+  EXPECT_EQ(ArrowArrayFinishBuildingDefault(&array, nullptr), NANOARROW_OK);
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(array.length, 11);
+  EXPECT_EQ(array.null_count, 2);
+  auto validity_buffer = reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t*>(array.buffers[0]);
+  auto data_buffer = reinterpret_cast<const uint16_t*>(array.buffers[1]);
+  EXPECT_EQ(validity_buffer[0], 0b11111001);
+  EXPECT_EQ(validity_buffer[1], 0b00000111);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[0], 15360);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[1], 0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[2], 0);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[3], 16896);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[4], 16967);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[5], 31744);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[6], 32256);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[7], 31744);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[8], 64512);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[9], 48128);
+  EXPECT_EQ(data_buffer[10], 0);

Review Comment:
   > Having a one-way test in at least one direction is also probably a good 
idea (in the unlikely event that the conversion is wrong in both directions). I 
think Python can do this:
   > 
   > ```python
   > import struct
   > import math
   > 
   > float_vals = [-12.3, 0, 12.3, math.nan]
   > packed = b"".join(struct.pack("e", val) for val in float_vals)
   > list(memoryview(packed).cast("H"))
   > #> [51750, 0, 18982, 32256]
   > ```
   
   Ah thanks for the numpy code! Shall I also add these one-way tests? It 
should be easy though/



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to