zanmato1984 commented on code in PR #44616:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/44616#discussion_r1948487464


##########
python/pyarrow/_dataset.pyx:
##########
@@ -4111,7 +4113,9 @@ class ScanNodeOptions(_ScanNodeOptions):
     **kwargs : dict, optional
         Scan options. See `Scanner.from_dataset` for possible arguments.       
 
     require_sequenced_output : bool, default False
-        Assert implicit ordering on data.
+        Batches are yielded sequentially, like single-threaded

Review Comment:
   Sorry for not making myself clear enough. By `still needed` I mean the 
existence of the parameter `require_sequenced_output`. It seems that when 
introduced in #44083 , it is determined by the parameter 
`require_sequenced_output` of `_dataset_to_decl`. Since now you have replaced 
the `require_sequenced_output` with `implicit_ordering` in `_dataset_to_decl`, 
I wonder if this could be removed as well. Or is "we should not remove a 
parameter of a public API" the consideration here?
   
   Thanks.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to