crepererum commented on PR #7226: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7226#issuecomment-2694970787
> > My understanding is wasip2 is not properly standardised yet > > I'm not sure what you are suggesting here, are you saying we should not support wasip1, we should add a test showing we support wasip2 (which seems redundant given it is a superset), something else? > > This PR is not about supporting particular WASM32 flavours, it is about supporting WASM32 at all... The CI specifically cares about WASIp1, not about p2. And as you said: plain WASM32 is gonna be a pain, because you to get random numbers, it's a side effect that the host needs to support (either via JS or via WASI). So I think my questions are: 1. do we need random numbers at all? 2. if we need any side effects, then I think we should settle on WASIp2. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
