tustvold commented on PR #7226: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/7226#issuecomment-2695194769
> The CI specifically cares about WASIp1, not about p2. This is fair, although this is simply because it predates wasmp2 existing, rather than any particular design decision. > do we need random numbers at all? Yes for retries and crypto > I think we should settle on WASIp2. At least at the time of writing wasip2 is explicitly labelled an experimental target [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/platform-support/wasm32-wasip2.html), whereas the same language is not used for wasip1. As such, and because wasip1 is closer to the browser target I suspect 90% or more of users are actually interested in, I think we should leave the CI unchanged. Although I don't feel strongly on this matter, my main goal with this PR is just to make WASM32 possible, I don't intend to personally work on wasm32 support beyond that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
