alamb commented on a change in pull request #10078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10078#discussion_r615377229
##########
File path: rust/arrow/Cargo.toml
##########
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ regex = "1.3"
lazy_static = "1.4"
packed_simd = { version = "0.3.4", optional = true, package = "packed_simd_2" }
chrono = "0.4"
-flatbuffers = "^0.8"
+flatbuffers = "=0.8.3" # 0.8.4 introduces const generics
Review comment:
this may be accidentally included from
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10081
##########
File path: rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/sort.rs
##########
@@ -379,7 +430,8 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(DataType::Float32,
*sort_exec.schema().field(0).data_type());
assert_eq!(DataType::Float64,
*sort_exec.schema().field(1).data_type());
- let result: Vec<RecordBatch> = collect(sort_exec).await?;
+ let result: Vec<RecordBatch> = collect(sort_exec.clone()).await?;
+ assert_eq!(sort_exec.metrics().get("outputRows").unwrap().value, 8);
assert_eq!(result.len(), 1);
Review comment:
Maybe also assert that the time counter was greater than zero?
##########
File path: rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/sort.rs
##########
@@ -56,7 +63,12 @@ impl SortExec {
expr: Vec<PhysicalSortExpr>,
input: Arc<dyn ExecutionPlan>,
) -> Result<Self> {
- Ok(Self { expr, input })
+ Ok(Self {
+ expr,
+ input,
+ output_rows: SQLMetric::counter("outputRows"),
+ sort_time_nanos: SQLMetric::time_nanos("sortTime"),
Review comment:
Given Rust's focus on compile time type checking, what would you think
about using typed counters rather than `String` keys?
So make the code look something like:
```suggestion
output_rows: SQLMetric<OutputRows>::new(),
sort_time_nanos: SQLMetric<SortTime>::new(),
```
##########
File path: rust/datafusion/src/physical_plan/mod.rs
##########
@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ pub type SendableRecordBatchStream = Pin<Box<dyn
RecordBatchStream + Send + Sync
pub enum MetricType {
/// Simple counter
Counter,
+ /// Time in nanoseconds
Review comment:
It would probably help to explicitly mention if this was wall clock
time, or cpu time . It looks like this PR saves wallclock time for sort
Both are probably interesting counters / metrics to eventually have
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]