alinaliBQ commented on PR #49787: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49787#issuecomment-4846586901
@kou Thanks for putting up the PR https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50288 for `dev/tasks/linux-packages/`. I just want to make sure I understand the ask, are you suggesting that: 1. We use `dev/tasks/linux-packages/` instead of CPack (this case I will close my current PRs for RPM/DEB, and the team's work on the ODBC Linux would be complete), 2. You'd like us to rework this PR to implement `dev/tasks/linux-packages/` after https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50288 is merged, or 3. are you okay with both `dev/tasks/linux-packages/` and CPack approach in this PR co-existing? I think it would be beneficial to include the ODBC Linux driver registration script. My initial thinking was that community could use CPack approach first, and then CPack approach can be phased out by `linux-packages` once that is complete. Alternatively, after this PR and https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49857 are merged, someone with knowledge in `linux-packages` could merge the 2 approaches together so that `linux-packages` implementation also does ODBC driver registration. Previous thread: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49766#discussion_r3203450442. Our team currently doesn't have capacity to test and verify the implementation with `linux-packages`. We appreciate your help here. cc @lidavidm -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
