Alb3e3 commented on issue #50524: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/50524#issuecomment-5104105821
Is anyone actively working on this? You mentioned on Jul 16 that you had a small C++ fix with focused regression coverage scoped out — if you're still planning to send it, please go ahead; I don't want to duplicate your work. If you'd rather hand it off, I'm happy to pick it up. I had a look at the kernel and the offset does need to be threaded through consistently: `pairwise_diff` reads the input values relative to the parent buffer instead of the sliced view, so the first output subtracts the pre-slice element (the `-98` in your example). A focused fix plus a regression test over a sliced input covering both `pairwise_diff` and `pairwise_diff_checked` looks right. Just let me know which way you'd prefer. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
