Rich-T-kid commented on code in PR #10945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10945#discussion_r4090080763


##########
arrow-select/src/take.rs:
##########
@@ -1589,6 +1637,36 @@ pub fn take_record_batch(
     RecordBatch::try_new(record_batch.schema(), columns)
 }
 
+/// Take rows by index from [`RecordBatch`], returning a new [`RecordBatch`], 
without bounds
+/// checking.
+///
+/// # Safety
+///
+/// The caller must guarantee that every non-null value in `indices` is a 
valid row index for
+/// `record_batch` (i.e. `index < record_batch.num_rows()`). Violating this 
will cause a panic
+/// or undefined behaviour inside the inner kernels.
+///
+/// # Errors
+///
+/// Returns an [`ArrowError`] if `indices` is not an integer array type.
+pub unsafe fn take_record_batch_unchecked(

Review Comment:
   my thoughts were that unchecked take methods would exist as parallels to 
their safe counter parts. as for why we need an 
`https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7001#issuecomment-5801503499`, 
this comment explains why 
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/7001#issuecomment-5801503499



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to