lidavidm commented on a change in pull request #11704:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11704#discussion_r750278502
##########
File path: cpp/src/arrow/dataset/test_util.h
##########
@@ -631,12 +646,92 @@ class FileFormatScanMixin : public
FileFormatFixtureMixin<FormatHelper>,
for (auto maybe_batch : PhysicalBatches(fragment)) {
ASSERT_OK_AND_ASSIGN(auto batch, maybe_batch);
row_count += batch->num_rows();
- AssertSchemaEqual(*batch->schema(), *expected_schema,
- /*check_metadata=*/false);
+ ASSERT_THAT(
+ batch->schema()->fields(),
+ ::testing::UnorderedPointwise(PointeesEquals(),
expected_schema->fields()))
+ << "EXPECTED:\n"
+ << expected_schema->ToString() << "\nACTUAL:\n"
+ << batch->schema()->ToString();
}
ASSERT_EQ(row_count, expected_rows());
}
+ void TestScanProjectedNested(bool fine_grained_selection = false) {
+ auto f32 = field("f32", float32());
+ auto f64 = field("f64", float64());
+ auto i32 = field("i32", int32());
+ auto i64 = field("i64", int64());
+ auto struct1 = field("struct1", struct_({f32, i32}));
+ auto struct2 = field("struct2", struct_({f64, i64, struct1}));
+ this->SetSchema({struct1, struct2, f32, f64, i32, i64});
+ this->ProjectNested({".struct1.f32", ".struct2.struct1",
".struct2.struct1.f32"});
+ this->SetFilter(equal(field_ref(FieldRef("struct2", "i64")), literal(0)));
+
+ std::shared_ptr<Schema> expected_schema;
+ if (fine_grained_selection) {
+ // Some formats, like Parquet, let you pluck only a part of a complex
type
+ expected_schema = schema({
+ field("struct1", struct_({f32})),
+ field("struct2", struct_({i64, struct1})),
+ });
+ } else {
+ expected_schema = schema({struct1, struct2});
+ }
+
+ {
+ auto reader = this->GetRecordBatchReader(opts_->dataset_schema);
+ auto source = this->GetFileSource(reader.get());
+ auto fragment = this->MakeFragment(*source);
+
+ int64_t row_count = 0;
+ for (auto maybe_batch : PhysicalBatches(fragment)) {
+ ASSERT_OK_AND_ASSIGN(auto batch, maybe_batch);
+ row_count += batch->num_rows();
+ ASSERT_THAT(
+ batch->schema()->fields(),
+ ::testing::UnorderedPointwise(PointeesEquals(),
expected_schema->fields()))
+ << "EXPECTED:\n"
+ << expected_schema->ToString() << "\nACTUAL:\n"
+ << batch->schema()->ToString();
+ }
+ ASSERT_EQ(row_count, expected_rows());
+ }
+ {
+ // File includes an extra child in struct2
Review comment:
We can handle missing fields just fine because (once ARROW-1888 is
implemented) we can synthesize a null child to stand in for it. But, we can't
handle a duplicate name because it's ambiguous which child we're referring to.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
