dragosmg edited a comment on pull request #11790: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11790#issuecomment-981527929
I think `decimal256()` is a bit more involved (not yet surfaced from C++). Hence the intention to implement them in 2 separate PRs. For `decimal128()` we didn't have to add a binding. It was merely a matter of porting the code for `decimal()`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
