mosche commented on code in PR #16947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/16947#discussion_r918011756


##########
sdks/java/io/amazon-web-services2/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/aws2/schemas/AwsSchemaProvider.java:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,220 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.beam.sdk.io.aws2.schemas;
+
+import static java.util.function.Function.identity;
+import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toMap;
+import static org.apache.beam.sdk.io.aws2.schemas.AwsSchemaUtils.getter;
+import static org.apache.beam.sdk.util.Preconditions.checkStateNotNull;
+import static 
org.apache.beam.vendor.guava.v26_0_jre.com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState;
+import static 
org.apache.beam.vendor.guava.v26_0_jre.com.google.common.collect.Sets.difference;
+import static 
org.apache.beam.vendor.guava.v26_0_jre.com.google.common.collect.Sets.newHashSet;
+
+import java.util.ArrayList;
+import java.util.List;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Map.Entry;
+import java.util.Objects;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.function.BiConsumer;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.io.aws2.schemas.AwsSchemaUtils.SdkBuilderSetter;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.io.aws2.schemas.AwsTypes.ConverterFactory;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.schemas.CachingFactory;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.schemas.Factory;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.schemas.FieldValueGetter;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.schemas.FieldValueTypeInformation;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.schemas.GetterBasedSchemaProvider;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.schemas.Schema;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.schemas.SchemaUserTypeCreator;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.transforms.SerializableFunction;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.values.Row;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.values.RowWithGetters;
+import org.apache.beam.sdk.values.TypeDescriptor;
+import org.apache.beam.vendor.guava.v26_0_jre.com.google.common.collect.Maps;
+import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;
+import software.amazon.awssdk.core.SdkField;
+import software.amazon.awssdk.core.SdkPojo;
+import software.amazon.awssdk.utils.builder.SdkBuilder;
+
+/**
+ * Schema provider for AWS {@link SdkPojo} models using the provided field 
metadata (@see {@link
+ * SdkPojo#sdkFields()}) rather than reflection.
+ *
+ * <p>This provider overrides{@link 
GetterBasedSchemaProvider#fromRowFunction(TypeDescriptor)} to
+ * instead use the generated builder factories with the setters from {@link 
SdkField}s, see {@link
+ * SdkField#set(Object, Object)}.
+ *
+ * <p>Note: Beam doesn't support self-recursive schemas. Some AWS models, such 
as {@link
+ * software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.AttributeValue} are 
self-recursive and cannot be
+ * used with this schema provider.

Review Comment:
   The lack of support of self-referential types in Beam was apparently by 
design, so there's no such issue. My initial idea for AWS was to "fake" it by 
just skipping over self-referential fields at some depth. But that is obviously 
not correct and potentially dangerous as it might silently ignore some data. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to