amaliujia commented on a change in pull request #12153:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/12153#discussion_r448547040



##########
File path: 
sdks/java/extensions/sql/zetasql/src/main/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/extensions/sql/zetasql/ZetaSQLPlannerImpl.java
##########
@@ -130,30 +135,58 @@ public RelRoot rel(SqlNode sqlNode) throws 
RelConversionException {
   }
 
   public RelRoot rel(String sql, QueryParameters params) {
-    this.cluster = RelOptCluster.create(planner, new RexBuilder(typeFactory));
-    this.expressionConverter = new ExpressionConverter(cluster, params);
+    RelOptCluster cluster = RelOptCluster.create(planner, new 
RexBuilder(typeFactory));
 
     QueryTrait trait = new QueryTrait();
 
-    // Set up table providers that need to be pre-registered
-    // TODO(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-8817): share this logic 
between dialects
-    List<List<String>> tables = Analyzer.extractTableNamesFromStatement(sql);
-    TableResolution.registerTables(this.defaultSchemaPlus, tables);
-
-    ResolvedStatement statement =
+    SqlAnalyzer analyzer =
         SqlAnalyzer.getBuilder()
             .withQueryParams(params)
             .withQueryTrait(trait)
             .withCalciteContext(config.getContext())
             .withTopLevelSchema(defaultSchemaPlus)
             .withTypeFactory((JavaTypeFactory) cluster.getTypeFactory())
-            .analyze(sql);
+            .build();
+
+    AnalyzerOptions options = SqlAnalyzer.initAnalyzerOptions(params);
+
+    // Set up table providers that need to be pre-registered
+    List<List<String>> tables = analyzer.extractTableNames(sql, options);
+    TableResolution.registerTables(this.defaultSchemaPlus, tables);
+    SimpleCatalog catalog =
+        analyzer.createPopulatedCatalog(defaultSchemaPlus.getName(), options, 
tables);
+
+    ImmutableMap.Builder<String, ResolvedCreateFunctionStmt> udfBuilder = 
ImmutableMap.builder();
+
+    ResolvedStatement statement;
+    ParseResumeLocation parseResumeLocation = new ParseResumeLocation(sql);
+    do {
+      statement = analyzer.analyzeNextStatement(parseResumeLocation, options, 
catalog);
+      if (statement.nodeKind() == RESOLVED_CREATE_FUNCTION_STMT) {
+        ResolvedCreateFunctionStmt createFunctionStmt = 
(ResolvedCreateFunctionStmt) statement;
+        // ResolvedCreateFunctionStmt does not include the full function name, 
so build it here.
+        String functionFullName =
+            String.format(
+                "%s:%s",
+                SqlAnalyzer.USER_DEFINED_FUNCTIONS,
+                String.join(".", createFunctionStmt.getNamePath()));
+        udfBuilder.put(functionFullName, createFunctionStmt);
+      } else if (statement.nodeKind() == RESOLVED_QUERY_STMT) {
+        if (!SqlAnalyzer.isEndOfInput(parseResumeLocation)) {

Review comment:
       I can tell line 185 and this line combined together to verify:
   1. only one SELECT in a statement list.
   2. that SELECT statement should be in the end of list.
   
   But from readability perspective, neither one explicitly tests there are 
more than one SELECT in a list. I am afraid that for people who don't have 
context to read code here, they could not get the one single SELECT constraint 
(although it is implied implicitly). 
   
   My suggestion is you only validate `cannot contain more than one SELECT 
statement` here and leave `Statement list must end in a SELECT statement` to 
line 185.




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to