sjvanrossum commented on code in PR #34135:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/34135#discussion_r1979614963


##########
sdks/python/apache_beam/io/gcp/bigquery_tools.py:
##########
@@ -351,6 +352,9 @@ class BigQueryWrapper(object):
   TEMP_DATASET = 'beam_temp_dataset_'
 
   HISTOGRAM_METRIC_LOGGER = MetricLogger()
+  
+  # Default TTL for cached table definitions in seconds
+  DEFAULT_TABLE_DEFINITION_TTL = 3600  # 1 hour

Review Comment:
   > from cachetools import TTLCache
   from cachetools.keys import hashkey
   from functools import partial
   #Use thread-safe TTLCache with proper key function
   self.table_cache = TTLCache(
   maxsize=self.DEFAULT_CACHE_MAX_SIZE,
   ttl=self.DEFAULT_TABLE_DEFINITION_TTL,
   getsizeof=None)
   
   Have another look at the comment that you responded to a couple minutes ago, 
since this suggestion doesn't address the issue with the lifetime scope of the 
cache container yet.
   Essentially, the cache should not be defined as an instance variable and 
either cachetools or functools should be sufficient, I don't think we have to 
mix and match them.
   



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@beam.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to