erratic-pattern commented on code in PR #10358:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10358#discussion_r1588480661
##########
datafusion/core/tests/simplification.rs:
##########
@@ -658,3 +658,18 @@ fn test_simplify_concat() {
let expected = concat(vec![col("c0"), lit("hello rust"), col("c1")]);
test_simplify(expr, expected)
}
+
+#[test]
+fn test_simplify_iterations() {
Review Comment:
> does this test fail without the change?
This was the example given in the original issue, though slightly modified
to make it more test friendly. I thought it was failing without the change,
though checking again now that appears to not be the case. I likely forgot to
retest once I went down the `log` simplifier bug rabbit hole.
> Maybe we could add the test from the ticket too:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1160#issuecomment-952905624
> @devinjdangelo 's deeply nested expressions usecase would also be
interesting to test:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/1160#issuecomment-1986906627
Good idea. I can add those.
I can also add the `simplify_inner` suggestion and then explicitly test the
number of iterations used.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
