erratic-pattern commented on code in PR #10358:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10358#discussion_r1588552047
##########
datafusion/optimizer/src/simplify_expressions/expr_simplifier.rs:
##########
@@ -3575,4 +3604,48 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(simplify(expr), expected);
}
+
+ #[test]
+ fn test_simplify_iterations() {
+ // TRUE
+ let expr = lit(true);
+ let expected = lit(true);
+ let (expr, num_iter) = simplify_count(expr);
+ assert_eq!(expr, expected);
+ assert_eq!(num_iter, 1);
+
+ // (true != NULL) OR (5 > 10)
+ let expr = lit(true).not_eq(lit_bool_null()).or(lit(5).gt(lit(10)));
+ let expected = lit_bool_null();
+ let (expr, num_iter) = simplify_count(expr);
+ assert_eq!(expr, expected);
+ assert_eq!(num_iter, 2);
+
+ // cast(now() as int64) < cast(to_timestamp(0) as int64) + i64::MAX
+ let expr = cast(now(), DataType::Int64)
+ .lt(cast(to_timestamp(vec![lit(0)]), DataType::Int64) +
lit(i64::MAX));
+ let expected = lit(true);
+ let (expr, num_iter) = simplify_count(expr);
+ assert_eq!(expr, expected);
+ assert_eq!(num_iter, 3);
+
+ // NOTE: this currently does not simplify
+ // (((c4 - 10) + 10) *100) / 100
Review Comment:
note that one of @devinjdangelo 's examples did not simplify. I think we
would need to rebalance parens in the simplifier or maybe the canonicalizer for
that to work.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
