jayzhan211 commented on code in PR #10445:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10445#discussion_r1597524103
##########
datafusion/expr/src/logical_plan/builder.rs:
##########
@@ -188,37 +181,61 @@ impl LogicalPlanBuilder {
n_cols
);
}
- field_types = row
- .iter()
- .enumerate()
- .map(|(j, expr)| {
- if let Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::Null) = expr {
- nulls.push((i, j));
- Ok(field_types[j].clone())
- } else {
- let data_type = expr.get_type(&empty_schema)?;
- if let Some(prev_data_type) = &field_types[j] {
- if prev_data_type != &data_type {
- return plan_err!("Inconsistent data type
across values list at row {i} column {j}. Was {prev_data_type} but found
{data_type}")
+ }
+
+ let empty_schema = DFSchema::empty();
+ let mut field_types: Vec<DataType> = Vec::with_capacity(n_cols);
+ for j in 0..n_cols {
+ let mut common_type: Option<DataType> = None;
+ for (i, row) in values.iter().enumerate() {
+ let value = &row[j];
+ if let Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::Null) = value {
+ continue;
+ } else {
+ let data_type = value.get_type(&empty_schema)?;
+ if let Some(prev_type) = common_type {
+ // get common type of each row values.
+ match comparison_coercion(&data_type, &prev_type) {
Review Comment:
I agree the `List coercion` is not correct. If you can remove it without
failure then it is nice to remove it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
