EpsilonPrime commented on issue #10815: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10815#issuecomment-2159192458
Given that names don't matter in Substrait (the final names are provided) is the problem solvable within the Substrait consumer for Datafusion? Shouldn't the consumer be able to rename the columns to whatever it wants? Stepping further back I wonder if the check is needed at all here -- is it trying to prevent extra work or is it trying to prevent confusion on its part later on? It may be designed for the case where the fields are named the same but are from different sources which isn't happening here. Perhaps the check needs to be made more precise? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
