kumarUjjawal commented on code in PR #21739: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/21739#discussion_r3196500095
########## datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/tpch/plans/q1.slt.part: ########## @@ -50,9 +50,9 @@ physical_plan 01)SortPreservingMergeExec: [l_returnflag@0 ASC NULLS LAST, l_linestatus@1 ASC NULLS LAST] 02)--SortExec: expr=[l_returnflag@0 ASC NULLS LAST, l_linestatus@1 ASC NULLS LAST], preserve_partitioning=[true] 03)----ProjectionExec: expr=[l_returnflag@0 as l_returnflag, l_linestatus@1 as l_linestatus, sum(lineitem.l_quantity)@2 as sum_qty, sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice)@3 as sum_base_price, sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * Int64(1) - lineitem.l_discount)@4 as sum_disc_price, sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * Int64(1) - lineitem.l_discount * Int64(1) + lineitem.l_tax)@5 as sum_charge, avg(lineitem.l_quantity)@6 as avg_qty, avg(lineitem.l_extendedprice)@7 as avg_price, avg(lineitem.l_discount)@8 as avg_disc, count(Int64(1))@9 as count_order] -04)------AggregateExec: mode=FinalPartitioned, gby=[l_returnflag@0 as l_returnflag, l_linestatus@1 as l_linestatus], aggr=[sum(lineitem.l_quantity), sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice), sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * Int64(1) - lineitem.l_discount), sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * Int64(1) - lineitem.l_discount * Int64(1) + lineitem.l_tax), avg(lineitem.l_quantity), avg(lineitem.l_extendedprice), avg(lineitem.l_discount), count(Int64(1))] +04)------AggregateExec: mode=FinalPartitioned, gby=[l_returnflag@0 as l_returnflag, l_linestatus@1 as l_linestatus], aggr=[sum(lineitem.l_quantity), sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice), sum(__common_expr_1) as sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * Int64(1) - lineitem.l_discount), sum(__common_expr_1 * Some(1),20,0 + lineitem.l_tax) as sum(lineitem.l_extendedprice * Int64(1) - lineitem.l_discount * Int64(1) + lineitem.l_tax), avg(lineitem.l_quantity), avg(lineitem.l_extendedprice), avg(lineitem.l_discount), count(Int64(1))] Review Comment: > The `Some(1)` bit is unfortunate indeed, but I think that's a separate issue. The physical explain output doesn't format literals as nicely as the logical plan output does. Yeah I noticed this but left as is for now. @adriangb what's your overall thoughts on the current approach. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
